According to the Kaiser Family Foundation , provided the following facts about sex education:. Comprehensive sex education is more diversely defined than abstinence. Generally, these programs include more medically accurate, evidence-based information about both contraception and abstinence, as well as the use of condoms to prevent STDs. Comprehensive programs usually also include information about healthy relationships, communication skills, and human development, among other topics.
This type of education topically excludes any information about the effectiveness or use of contraception or condom to prevent pregnancy and STDs. The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Search form Search. Last Updated pm Sep 30, See Coronavirus Updates for information on returning to campus, and more. Two new papers highlight the scientific and ethical shortcomings of the abstinence-only-until-marriage approach.
These programs provide students with information on building healthy relationships, the benefits of abstinence and the consequences of premarital sexual behavior. Broken down further according to Mississippi Code.
How does abstinence-plus education compare? In other words, schools that adopt abstinence-plus can offer evidence-based and age-appropriate facts about contraceptive options and their effectiveness related to pregnancy and sexual health. There is less of a focus on marriage or religion and more of a practical approach to healthy behaviors and decision-making.
Teen sexual health outcomes over the past decade have been mixed. On one hand, teen pregnancy and birth rates have fallen dramatically, reaching record lows. On the other hand, rates of sexually transmitted infections STIs among teens and young adults have been on the rise. Many schools and community groups have adopted programming that incorporates abstinence from sexual activity as an approach to reduce teen pregnancy and STI rates. The content of these programs, however, can vary considerably, from those that stress abstinence as the only option for youth, to those that address abstinence along with medically accurate information about safer sexual practices including the use of contraceptives and condoms.
Early action from the Trump administration has signaled renewed support for abstinence-only programming. This fact sheet reviews the types of sex education models and state policies surrounding them, the major sources of federal funding for both abstinence and safer sex education, and summarizes the research on impact of these programs on teen sexual behavior.
Sex and HIV Education. State Laws and Policies, as of May 1, Fact sheet examines abstinence education programs, funding and impact on teen sexual behavior. There are two main approaches towards sex education: abstinence-only and comprehensive sex education Table 1.
These categories are broad, and the content, methods, and targeted populations can vary widely between programs within each model. They generally do not discuss contraceptive methods or condoms unless to emphasize their failure rates. Comprehensive sex education is more diversely defined. Most generally, these programs include medically accurate, evidence-based information about both contraception and abstinence, as well as condoms to prevent STI transmission.
Other programs emphasize safe-sex practices and often include information about healthy relationships and lifestyles. The type of sex education model used can vary by school district, and even by school.
Some states have enacted laws that offer broad guidelines around sex education, though most have no requirement that sex education be taught at all. Only 24 states and DC require that sex education be taught in schools Text Box 1. More often, states enact laws that dictate the type of information included in sex education if it is taught, leaving up to school districts, and sometimes the individual school, whether to require sex education and which curriculum to use.
0コメント