An initial minimal fitness cost that was imposed on the E. Coevolution induced changes were observed in both the evolved host cells and plasmids. Interestingly, evolved plasmid R1 had slightly lower transfer rates in the evolved host than in the ancestral host Dahlberg and Chao, These findings were corroborated by a similar study where it was found that an evolved plasmid R1 even conferred a relative fitness advantage to the original E.
In addition, the original R1 plasmid had no fitness cost in the evolved E. These results and other studies have led to the proposal that CP mediated bacterial conjugation is a coevolutionary process Harrison and Brockhurst, Although not measured directly, the data of Dahlberg and Chao suggest that a major cost of CP carriage is the expression of tra genes.
In line with this proposition is the fact that the activation of tra genes in case of plasmid R1 causes the up-regulation of extracytoplasmic and cytoplasmic stress regulons Zahrl et al. In addition, F plasmid tra gene expression and T4S system assembly causes increased sensitivity to bile salts Bidlack and Silverman, In any case, due to the regulatory regime that keeps tra genes OFF in the majority of donors, metabolic burden and exposure to pilus specific bacteriophages is not evenly distributed within a population but instead restricted to a small fraction of the population.
In this way, possible detrimental and cell threatening effects associated with tra gene expression are limited to a few cells within a population whereas all cells retain beneficial genes and the potential for HGT.
An intrinsically beneficial feature contributing to the persistence of CPs within bacterial populations may be their well documented ability to promote formation of biofilms see above. Interestingly, besides the specific regulatory mechanisms discussed in this review that operate to control tra gene expression, there is a general silencing mechanism in enterobacteria that mediates silencing of laterally acquired genes by H-NS and related proteins Navarre et al.
Although the molecular details of how regulatory networks control tra gene expression are different in the conjugation systems presented in this review, there is a common theme: As a default, tra genes are OFF and whenever positive stimuli are present, not the whole population transits to the ON stage but only a fraction of the cells carrying a conjugative element.
In this way the metabolic burden fitness cost imposed by expression of tra genes and assembly of a cell envelope localized DNA secretion machine a T4SS is carried not by the whole population but distributed to only a few cells within a population.
Further studies at the single cell level are needed to reveal whether the transformation of only a fraction of a donor cell population into transfer competent cells is due to a stochastic process or depends on different physiological states such as metabolic conditions, cellular fitness and cell age.
Moreover, positioning of individual cells in structured communities microcolonies or biofilms may influence transition to transfer competence.
Undoubtedly intelligent strategies exist to minimize or even eliminate fitness costs associated with the carriage of conjugative elements. Populations harboring CPs and presumably ICEs can grow and divide largely unaffected by the presence of these elements. At the same time, some cells within a population do become transfer competent and thereby secure the spread and persistence of conjugation modules in many different bacterial species, among them pathogens causing disease in humans, animals, and plants.
Thus, genes carried on the conjugative element, which are beneficial for the host cell in particular habitats e. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. Althorpe, N. Transient transcriptional activation of the IncI1 plasmid anti-restriction gene ardA and SOS inhibition gene psiB early in conjugating recipient bacteria.
Arthur, D. EMBO J. Auchtung, J. Regulation of a Bacillus subtilis mobile genetic element by intercellular signaling and the global DNA damage response. Babic, A. Efficient gene transfer in bacterial cell chains.
Beaber, J. SOS response promotes horizontal dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes. Nature , 72— Bhatty, M. The expanding bacterial type IV secretion lexicon. Bidlack, J. An active type IV secretion system encoded by the F plasmid sensitizes Escherichia coli to bile salts.
Bose, B. Regulation of horizontal gene transfer in Bacillus subtilis by activation of a conserved site-specific protease.
Cascales, E. Science , — Chatterjee, A. Antagonistic self-sensing and mate-sensing signaling controls antibiotic-resistance transfer. Clarke, M. F-pili dynamics by live-cell imaging.
Clewell, D. Tales of conjugation and sex pheromones: a plasmid and enterococcal odyssey. Elements 1, 38— Dahlberg, C. Amelioration of the cost of conjugative plasmid carriage in Escherichia coli K Genetics , — Pubmed Abstract Pubmed Full Text. De la Cruz, F. Conjugative DNA metabolism in Gram-negative bacteria.
FEMS Microbiol. Dempsey, W. Sense and antisense transcripts of traM , a conjugal transfer gene of the antibiotic resistance plasmid R Dionisio, F. The evolution of a conjugative plasmid and its ability to increase bacterial fitness. Dunny, G. Regulatory circuits controlling enterococcal conjugation: lessons for functional genomics.
Conjugational junctions: morphology of specific contacts in conjugating Escherichia coli bacteria. Eisenbrandt, R. Conjugative pili of IncP plasmids, and the Ti plasmid T pilus are composed of cyclic subunits. Frost, L. Analysis of the sequence and gene products of the transfer region of the F sex factor. Regulation of bacterial conjugation: balancing opportunity with adversity. Future Microbiol. Why is entry exclusion an essential feature of conjugative plasmids?
Plasmid 60, 1— Ghigo, J. Natural conjugative plasmids induce bacterial biofilm development. Nature , — Goessweiner-Mohr, N. Conjugative type IV secretion systems in Gram-positive bacteria.
Plasmid 70, — Guglielmini, J. Evolution of conjugation and type IV secretion systems. The repertoire of ICE in prokaryotes underscores the unity, diversity, and ubiquity of conjugation.
PLoS Genet. Harrison, E. Plasmid-mediated horizontal gene transfer is a coevolutionary process. Trends Microbiol. Haudecoeur, E. A fine control of quorum-sensing communication in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Invasion of E. Lambertsen, L. Plasmid 52, — Lang, J. Concerted transfer of the virulence Ti plasmid and companion At plasmid in the Agrobacterium tumefaciens -induced plant tumour.
Lau-Wong, I. Lawley, T. Bacterial conjugative transfer: visualization of successful mating pairs and plasmid establishment in live Escherichia coli. Madsen, J. The interconnection between biofilm formation and horizontal gene transfer.
FEMS Immunol. McCool, J. Measurement of SOS expression in individual Escherichia coli K cells using fluorescence microscopy.
Modi, R. Coevolution in bacterial-plasmid populations. Evolution 45, — CrossRef Full Text. Molin, S. Gene transfer occurs with enhanced efficiency in biofilms and induces enhanced stabilisation of the biofilm structure.
Navarre, W. Genes Dev. Norman, A. Conjugative plasmids: vessels of the communal gene pool. B Biol. TraM of plasmid R1 controls transfer gene expression as an integrated control element in a complex regulatory network. Conjugative transfer and cis-mobilization of a genomic island by an integrative and conjugative element of Streptococcus agalactiae. Ramsey, M. The gonococcal genetic island and type IV secretion in the pathogenic Neisseria. Reisner, A.
In situ monitoring of IncF plasmid transfer on semi-solid agar surfaces reveals a limited invasion of plasmids in recipient colonies. Plasmid 1, 1—7. Rivera-Calzada, A. Structure of a bacterial type IV secretion core complex at subnanometre resolution. Samuels, A. Conjugative junctions in RP4-mediated mating of Escherichia coli. Seoane, J. An individual-based approach to explain plasmid invasion in bacterial populations.
Singh, P. Mobility of the native Bacillus subtilis conjugative plasmid pLS20 Is regulated by intercellular signaling. The antibiotics don't necessarily kill the cells, they only slow their growth. If you put a lot of non-resistant cells on a plate, you might see some living cells after incubation.
For this experiment, you should look for the formation of new colonies: isolated dots of bacteria that form when a single cell grows into a large blob. Satellite colonies are another potential problem with this procedure, specifically in the mixed culture. If isolated colonies grow, then they're resistant, meaning that conjugation occurred.
As positive controls, restreak some of the same colonies onto amp alone and strep alone. If conjugation failed, you'll probably find that these colonies grow on strep and not on amp.
We don't have the satellite colony problem with strep, because strep-resistant cells tolerate strep, but they don't destroy it. After studying and recording your plate results, extract total nucleic acid from your colonies, and save some plates as described in the instructions. Conjugation in Escherichia coli: A laboratory exercise Phornphisutthimas et al. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education. I based the Bio 6B lab procedure on this article, but found it necessary to change some of the procedures in order to get results comparable to those presented in this article.
Conjugative plasmids and mobilizable plasmids are slightly different things; pARO is a mobilizable plasmid. This page includes an old-fashioned graphic that shows the difference. Mobility of Plasmids. Smillie et al. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. Detailed background on the characteristics of plasmids that make them mobilizable.
Home Bio 6B home Announcements and basic information. Lab Guide Detailed daily agenda. Plasmids: Lab overview. PCR for detecting phage. Conjugation The Bio 6B lab explores bacterial plasmids and operons through a set of connected experiments over multiple lab days. The concepts behind these labs are presented in a set of related pages on this site: Operons. Basics of gene expression; both a lecture topic and a lab topic. Background for the labs.
Plasmid Lab Overview. Lays out the experimental approach for the Conjugation and pGLO labs, which share some of the same methods. Bacterial Conjugation.
0コメント